This, I hope, is about Law-abiding people 'entertaining' other Law-abiding people with the fancies and fallacies of statute 'law'. Let me be clear that I’m not referring to Common Law, but statute ‘law' and by-laws which have no jurisdiction over us, without our express consent. Statutes act like (pretend to be) law and have the form of Law, and they are referred to as Law by those who operate under them, but are without jurisdiction as pertains to humans unless you are a legal person working as an agent for, or performing a function for, the entity that created the statute.
"Ignorance of law is no excuse" is a maxim of Common Law, but what about ignorance of statutes? What of those who, out of their ignorance of real Law, apply statute ‘law' against those over whom these statutes have no jurisdiction? I think we need to hold them accountable. What do you think?
I'll try to keep these 'thoughts' brief, keeping to a single point. I'll write what I learn at the time and that may change as I gain insight. Many others are involved in the search for truth and I gain from reading their work.
I am not anti-government, rather, I believe that legitimate government can be useful—when it serves the people using corporations to do so—under us, not over us. Present federal and provincial governments are corporations serving other corporations using us—men and women—as their ATM's.
Legitimate government is under the authority of the people, not over us.
If anyone finds error in these 'entertaining' thoughts please teach me where I went wrong.
Subscribe to the RSS feed and/or check back here often and also through the achieves, as I do update (and correct) details occasionally...
"Democracy is a pathetic belief in the collective wisdom of individual ignorance. No one in this world, so far as I know—and I have researched the records for years, and employed agents to help me—has ever lost money by underestimating the intelligence of the great masses of the plain people.…
Merry Christmas Pope Innocent III
In order to undo the excommunication issued agains him in 1208 King John granted of all of holdings of England to the Papacy via Pope Innocent III on May 15, 1213:
The Treaty of Verona - 1213
"We ...do offer and freely concede to ...our lord pope Innocent and to his Catholic successors, the whole kingdom of England and the whole kingdom Ireland, with all their rights and appurtenances, ...binding our successors and our heirs by our wife forever, in similar manner to perform fealty and show homage to him who shall be chief pontiff at that time, and to the Roman church without demur."
It would seem that the Magna Charta, signed 3 years later by King John is void since John no longer had authority to grant anything to those nobles pressing him to sign their Charter.