This, I hope, is about Law-abiding people 'entertaining' other Law-abiding people with the fancies and fallacies of statute 'law'. Let me be clear that I’m not referring to Common Law, but statute ‘law' and by-laws which have no jurisdiction over us, without our express consent. Statutes act like (pretend to be) law and have the form of Law, and they are referred to as Law by those who operate under them, but are without jurisdiction as pertains to humans unless you are a legal person working as an agent for, or performing a function for, the entity that created the statute.
"Ignorance of law is no excuse" is a maxim of Common Law, but what about ignorance of statutes? What of those who, out of their ignorance of real Law, apply statute ‘law' against those over whom these statutes have no jurisdiction? I think we need to hold them accountable. What do you think?
I'll try to keep these 'thoughts' brief, keeping to a single point. I'll write what I learn at the time and that may change as I gain insight. Many others are involved in the search for truth and I gain from reading their work.
I am not anti-government, rather, I believe that legitimate government can be useful—when it serves the people using corporations to do so—under us, not over us. Present federal and provincial governments are corporations serving other corporations using us—men and women—as their ATM's.
Legitimate government is under the authority of the people, not over us.
If anyone finds error in these 'entertaining' thoughts please teach me where I went wrong.
Subscribe to the RSS feed and/or check back here often and also through the achieves, as I do update (and correct) details occasionally...
“Our land and its wealth resides equally in the hands of all the people, and by such justice is the True Law honored and Liberty assured”
Vic Beck brings some interesting finds to the table. From the Business Names Act for Ontario
2. (2) No individual shall carry on business or identify his or her business to the public under a name other than his or her own name unless the name is registered by that individual. R.S.O. 1990, c. B.17, s. 2 (2).
Did you register the all caps name? Did you register your birth? Why are you carrying on business under that name?…
January 14 - General Executor
It was previously suggested that rather than be the Underwriter, Agent, or Trustee for the "LEGAL PERSON" JOHN DAVID DOE you might want to be the General Executor.
As General Executor you could still be held responsible for the debts and obligations of the entity JOHN DAVID DOE—unless you appoint a Trustee.
Are you an Agent?
Your name in capital letters—JOHN DAVID DOE—represents a legal ENTITY created by some branch of the government, agency, or bank. Since this ENTITY exists without a voice, mobility, etc. have you, unknowingly, been assigned responsibility to act as the agent for this …