This, I hope, is about Law-abiding people 'entertaining' other Law-abiding people with the fancies and fallacies of statute 'law'. Let me be clear that I’m not referring to Common Law, but statute ‘law' and by-laws which have no jurisdiction over us, without our express consent. Statutes act like (pretend to be) law and have the form of Law, and they are referred to as Law by those who operate under them, but are without jurisdiction as pertains to humans unless you are a legal person working as an agent for, or performing a function for, the entity that created the statute

"The only legal person known to our form of law is the corporation, the body corporate." Hague v. Cancer Relief & Research Institute, [1939] 4 DLR 191 (Man. K.B.)

"Ignorance of law is no excuse" is a maxim of Common Law, but what about ignorance of statutes? What of those who, out of their ignorance of real Law, apply statute ‘law' against those over whom these statutes have no jurisdiction? I think we need to hold them accountable. What do you think? 

I'll try to keep these 'thoughts' brief, keeping to a single point. I'll write what I learn at the time and that may change as I gain insight. Many others are involved in the search for truth and I gain from reading their work.  

I am not anti-government, rather, I believe that legitimate government can be useful—when it serves the people using corporations to do so—under us, not over us. Present federal and provincial governments are corporations serving other corporations using us—men and women—as their ATM's.

Legitimate government is under the authority of the people, not over us.

If anyone finds error in these 'entertaining' thoughts please teach me where I went wrong.

Subscribe to the RSS feed and/or check back here often and also through the achieves, as I do update (and correct) details occasionally...

September 13, 2014 - Human Rights in Ontario

According to the Human Rights Code, R.S.O. 1990, CHAPTER H.19 (read it!) a "person" is defined as:

“person” in addition to the extended meaning given it by Part VI (Interpretation) of the Legislation Act, 2006, includes an employment agency, an employers’ organization, an unincorporated association, a trade or occupational association, a trade union, a partnership, a municipality, a board of police commissioners established under the Police Act, being chapter 381 of the Revised Statutes of Ontario, 1980, and a police services board established under the Police Services Act; (“personne”)

When we look at the "extended meaning given it by Part VI (Interpretation) of the Legislation Act, 2006" we find this:

September 4, 2014 - Employee "Benefits"

I've been in the employ of a few large corporations over the years where there were perks or benefits available to me through that relationship.

For example, I could go to a safety shoe store and pick out a pair of shoes or boots and not have to pay for them. …

August 2014

August 17, 2014 - First in Time, First in Line

August 19, 2014 - Government Power to Licence

August 28, 2014 - Layers of Government

July 2014

July 14, 2014 - City Corporations

July 27 2014 - Anti-Government 

June 2014

June 2, 2014 - "Secrecy" is Repugnant

June 14, 2014 - Injured

May 2014

May 4, 2014 - On Stage or Off

May 30, 2014 - Elector?

April 2014

April 16, 2014 - Change of Approach

April 24, 2014 - Artificial or Real

Nothing on this private website is to be construed as legal advice.  Use what you read as a part of your research to establish your understanding. Your actions remain your responsibility. All natural rights reserved. © 2012 Steve, a man. <><