This, I hope, is about Law-abiding people 'entertaining' other Law-abiding people with the fancies and fallacies of statute 'law'. Let me be clear that I’m not referring to Common Law, but statute ‘law' and by-laws which have no jurisdiction over us, without our express consent. Statutes act like (pretend to be) law and have the form of Law, and they are referred to as Law by those who operate under them, but are without jurisdiction as pertains to humans unless you are a legal person working as an agent for, or performing a function for, the entity that created the statute.
Who is the "our" in this case law? The court system? The government that directs their court system?
"Ignorance of law is no excuse" is a maxim of Common Law, but what about ignorance of statutes? Ignorance of statute law is a valid excuse for a man who is not obligated to that form of law. What of those who, out of their ignorance of real Law, apply statute ‘law' against those over whom these statutes have no jurisdiction? I think we need to hold them accountable. What do you think?
I'll try to keep these 'thoughts' brief, keeping to a single point. I'll write what I learn at the time and that may change as I gain insight. Many others are involved in the search for truth and I gain from reading their work. I trust this will be an entertaining experience.
I am not anti-government, rather, I believe that legitimate government can be useful—when it serves the people using corporations to do so—under us, not over us. Present federal and provincial governments are corporations serving other corporations using us—men and women—as their ATM's.
Legitimate government is under the authority of the people, not over us.
If anyone finds error in these 'entertaining' thoughts please teach me where I went wrong.
Subscribe to the RSS feed and/or check back here often and also browse the achieves, as I do update (and correct) details occasionally...
After some 5 years of involvement in our court systems I’ve come to the conclusion that there is no justice to be found there.
The goal of those judges and justices is to maintain the status quo of the system by any means including entrapment.
Wake up people!
Do you read anything in the following oaths that commits the Prime Minister or his government to the people—you, me and our welfare?
The Oath of Allegiance comes first. It goes like this:
I, [name], do swear (or declare) that I will be faithful and bear true allegiance to Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth the Second, Queen of Canada, Her Heirs and Successors. So help me God.
Next comes the Oath of the Members of the Privy Council:
I, [name], do solemnly and sincerely swear (or declare) that I shall be a true and faithful servant to Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth the Second, as a member of Her Majesty’s Privy Council for Canada. I will in all things to be treated, debated and resolved in Privy Council, faithfully, honestly and truly declare my mind and my opinion. I shall keep secret all matters committed and revealed to me in this capacity, or that shall be secretly treated of in Council. Generally, in all things I shall do as a faithful and true servant ought to do for Her Majesty.
The third oath, which is specific to the ministry assigned each new minister (and even existing members of the Privy Council must swear or affirm), goes like this:
I, [name], do solemnly and sincerely promise and swear (or declare) that I will truly and faithfully, and to the best of my skill and knowledge, execute the powers and trusts reposed in me as [position]. So help me God.
He/they are working for the Elizabeth, in the open and in secret. …
I think those who live on Canada put up with a lot of crap from our public servants and especially from those who masquerade as one. The most offensive is the Canada Revenue Agency—except it’s not a Canadian agency and it doesn’t generate any revenue except by plunder. …